Configurable state model for supply chain management

ABSTRACT

Methods and systems for supply chain management in accordance with a state model. A supply chain management system includes a transaction state module within an inter-enterprise server assessable by trading partners. The transaction state module can define a state model which allows a trading partner to view a transaction and perform an action in accordance with a state of the transaction. The state model describes, in association with each state, which of the trading partners have visibility to the transaction and ability to perform an action. The trading partners can include consumers, retailers, distributors, etc. The transactions can include a forecast order, a purchase order, a billing, a product shipment, a payment, an invoice, a credit memo, a request for quote (RFQ), and a return material authorization (RMA). States of the transaction can include, for example, create, open, public view, private view, publish, commit, cancel, supersede, and the like.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/660,747, entitled “Configurable State Model For Supply Chain Management,” filed on Mar. 10, 2005, the subject matter of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety; and this application is related to the following commonly owned applications: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/659,829, filed on Mar. 8, 2005 and entitled “Program-Based Supply Chain Management”; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/660,747, filed on Mar. 10, 2005 and entitled “Configurable State Model for Supply Chain Management”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/158,371, filed on Jun. 22, 2005 and entitled “Program-Based Supply Chain Management”; and a U.S. non-provisional utility patent application filed on Mar. 8, 2006 and entitled “Custom Application Builder for Supply Chain Management” (Attorney Docket No. 25174-11377) (based on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/660,543).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to supply chain management, and more specifically, to inter-enterprise supply chain management software that manages supply chain transaction data using programs.

2. Description of the Related Art

Outsourcing has become very popular in all sectors of the industry and especially in product manufacturing. Companies no longer manufacture and assemble all components of a product themselves, but outsource most or all parts of the development, manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of the product. For example, companies A and B may manufacture and sell parts to company C. Company C may assemble those parts and sell assembled modules of a product to company D. Company D may assemble such modules together with other components and modules obtained from other companies, and sell the final product to Company E. Company E may sell the product under its brand to a distributor Company F which sells the final product to a retailer company G, which eventually sells the final product to the end consumer.

Since most or all parts of the development, manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of the product are outsourced, no single company has control of all the supply chain transaction data and information relating to the overall development, manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of the product. Therefore, enterprise supply chain management software that manages the data relating to the role played by only one company in the process of development, manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of the product cannot effectively manage the entire outsourcing process.

Conventional inter-enterprise supply chain management software resides in a separate location apart from and between the various companies. The various companies involved in such process exchange data with the conventional inter-enterprise supply chain management software according to the format of their own enterprise supply chain management software, and are able to view or perform actions on certain supply chain management transaction data (e.g., placing an order, paying an invoice) using the conventional inter-enterprise supply chain management software. At the same time, such companies are able to obtain and monitor information on the entire process of development, manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of the product through the conventional inter-enterprise supply chain management software.

One shortcoming of the conventional inter-enterprise supply chain management software is that transactions are typically presented from one point of view. In other words, similar options for viewing and performing actions against a transaction can be presented to each user regardless of their role in the transaction or a current state of the transaction.

Therefore, what is needed is a method of system for allowing accessibility to transactions in a supply chain management system in accordance with a configurable state model.

SUMMARY

The present invention provides methods and systems for supply chain management in accordance with a state model. In one embodiment, a supply chain management system includes a transaction state module within an inter-enterprise server assessable by trading partners. The transaction state module can define a state model which allows a trading partner to view a transaction and perform an action in accordance with a state of the transaction. The state model describes, in association with each state, which of the trading partners have visibility to the transaction and ability to perform an action. The trading partners can include consumers, retailers, distributors, etc. The transactions can include a forecast of an order or an actual order. States of the transaction can include, for example, create, open, public view, private view, publish, commit, cancel, supersede, and the like.

In one embodiment, a default state model establishes parameters based on a role of the trading partner in the supply chain. For example, a retailer that originally places a transaction can have full visibility and action privileges throughout the lifecycle of the transaction. On the other hand, a supplier may only be able to view a transaction once it has been committed to by the retailer. In addition, the supplier may be able to close the transaction, while the retailer is not able to do so. The privileges can be set according to factors such as business processes, company policy, or industry norms.

Advantageously, the supply chain management system can automatically control access on a per-trading partner basis using the configurable state model.

The features and advantages described herein are not all inclusive, and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of the drawings, specifications, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes and may not have been selected to circumscribe the claimed invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Like reference numerals are used for like elements in the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a supply chain management system using a state model according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an inter-enterprise server of the supply chain management system according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a method for managing a supply chain with the state model according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 4A-E are user interfaces for configuration the state model according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for managing the transaction by allowing access to trading partners based on the state model according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a state diagram illustrating an example of state transitions according to one embodiment of the present invention.

The figures depict embodiments of the present invention for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following discussion that alternative embodiments of the structures and methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles of the invention described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Methods and systems for supply chain management with a state model are described. Generally, the state model refers to a status of a transaction that is within a supply chain. The status can be affected by various trading partners that perform actions with respect to the transaction. For example, a supplier can check the availability of goods at a central warehouse responsive to a purchase order received from a retailer. In the meantime, the supplier can change the state of the purchase order from open to pending commit. Satisfied that the order can be fulfilled, the supplier can change the state from pending commit to commit. The goods can be shipped from a central warehouse to a regional warehouse and updated within the supplier's proprietary supply chain management system without affecting the information available to the retailer (i.e., no change in state). Once the shipping has occurred, the retailer can change the state from pending or commit to close. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the embodiment described herein with respect to a supply chain is only exemplary and can be modified for different applications such as a package delivery system or the like.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system 100 for supply chain management according to one embodiment of the present invention. System 100 comprises an inter-enterprise server 101 in communication with various trading partners 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116 through, for example, a data network (e.g., the Internet). Trading partners 102-116 in the supply chain interact with one another in the process of developing, manufacturing, marketing and selling one or more products. A number of trading relations 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, and 130 exist, where each trading relation involves two trading partners. For example, the trading relation 122 involves two trading partners 104, 106. In one embodiment, trading relations 120-130 affect how the state model is configured.

Trading partners 102-116 can exchange supply chain data with inter-enterprise server 101 and other trading partners 102-116. Trading partners 102-116 can comprise a computing device (e.g., a personal computer or server device) operated by a companies or other type of entity involved in the supply chain. Trading partners 102-116 can have different roles relative to other trading partners 102-116 as transactions progress through the supply chain. The roles within system 101 can include buyers, manufacturers, suppliers, and vendors. Trading partners 102-116 typically maintain their own enterprise supply chain management software for managing its own supply chain transaction data. However, some of the supply chain transaction data is shared with other trading partners 102-116 for the purpose of tracking. More specifically, trading partners 102-116 can change a state associated with the transaction. Changes in state can result from various actions such as placing a purchase order (PO), billing, shipping a product, remitting a payment, etc. For example, one trading partner 108 may be waiting for parts to arrive from another trading partner 110, but would not know whether such parts were shipped from the trading partner 110 unless trading partner 110 makes such information available to trading partner 108. In one embodiment, trading partners 102-116 are only able to view transactions in accordance with a state model. In another embodiment, trading partners 102-116 are only able to make changes to the state in accordance with the state model.

Inter-enterprise server 101 exchanges the supply chain data with trading partners 102-116 as described. Inter-enterprise server 101 can be a computing device (e.g., a personal computer or a server device) operated by a service provider for supply chain management. In one embodiment, inter-enterprise server 101 manages a state model associated with each transaction. When trading partners 102-116 access inter-enterprise server 101 to view the supply chain data and to potentially perform actions on the transactions, inter-enterprise server 101 allows viewing or changes in accordance with the state model. Inter-enterprise server 101 and the state models are described in further detail below.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of inter-enterprise server 101 according to one embodiment of the present invention. Inter-enterprise server 101 comprises a web interface 201, a transaction state module 202, supply chain database 203, and business logic module 204. Inter-enterprise server 101 can include additional components (not shown) such as a processor, a hard driver, etc.

In one embodiment, web interface 201 interfaces with the trading partners by packing and unpacking the supply chain data in data packets suitable for transport across the network (e.g., TCP/IP packets). Web interface 201 can also provide a set of application programming interfaces, or APIs, for issuing commands to transaction state module 202.

Transaction state module 202 allows configuration of state models for transactions. For example, a wizard displays a set of user interfaces such as those illustrated below. Transaction state module 202 stores the configurations in a memory device (not shown) such as hard drive or a RAM device. In response to access by a trading partner 102-116, transactions state module 202 refers to the state model to determine visibility configurations and outputs supply chain data from supply chain database 203. When actions are requested against the transaction, transaction state module 202 refers to the state model to determine action configurations and can implement business logic rules from business logic module 204. For example, business logic module can send out an e-mail to a purchasing department of an initiating trading partner once an order has been closed. Methods implemented within transaction state module 202 are discussed further below.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a method 300 for managing transaction states in during supply chain management according to one embodiment of the present invention. The method 300 can be implemented a system for supply chain management (e.g., system 100).

A state model is defined 310 by, for example, an administrator of supply chain management system, a trading partner (e.g., one of trading partners 106-112), or a vendor (e.g., default state models) using, for example, user interfaces shown in FIGS. 4A-E. More specifically, FIG. 4A shows a user interface 410 for entering general information about the state model such as name and transaction type. FIG. 4B shows a user interface 420 for viewing transaction visibility for each of the trading partners, and FIG. 4C shows a user interface 430 for selecting transaction visibility. FIG. 4D shows a user interface 440 for selecting actions for state transitions. FIG. 4E shows a user interface 450 for selecting how a role of the trading partner that performs an action will affect the state. In one embodiment, the state model is pre-defined, and thus only needs to be associated with a particular transaction. Additionally, default state models that are configured according to industry norms can be supplied by a vendor. The trading partner can either modify an existing state model or fully customize the state model to suit their business process.

The availability of a transaction refers to which of the trading partners will be able to view, or have visibility to, the transaction. For example, a supplier may be unable to view a transaction as a public draft of a buyer until it is committed. Table 1 is an example of transaction availability for a forecast transaction; table 2 is an example of transaction availability for a create order action; and table 3 is an example of transaction availability for an order transaction. TABLE 1 Transaction visibility for a forecast transaction Buyer Manufacturer Supplier Public Draft ✓ ✓ Private Draft ✓ Committed ✓ ✓ ✓ Closed ✓ ✓ ✓ Pending Commit ✓ ✓ ✓

TABLE 2 Transaction visibility for a create order action. Order Type Customer Supplier Standard ✓ Blanket ✓ Transfer ✓ ✓ Consignment ✓ Proxy ✓ Blanket Proxy ✓ RMA ✓

TABLE 3 Transaction visibility for an order transaction Buyer Manufacturer Supplier Third Party Cancelled Closed Deferred Draft Open ✓ ✓ ✓ Pending ✓ ✓ Pending(B) ✓ ✓ Pending(S) ✓ ✓ Pending(Third Party) Pending Cancel Pending Cancel(B) Pending Cancel(S)

The trading partner can initiate 320 a transaction. The transaction can be, for example, a forecast order, a purchase order (PO), a billing, a product shipment, a payment, an invoice, a credit memo, a request for quote (RFQ), and a return material authorization (RMA). For example, a buyer can place an order for televisions with a manufacturer. In turn, the manufacturer can place several orders for components from its suppliers.

The trading partner associates 330 the state model with the transaction. An inter-enterprise server (e.g., inter-enterprise server 101) can manage 340 the transaction by allowing access to the trading partners based on the state model, as described further in FIG. 5.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method 330 for managing the transaction by allowing access to the trading partners based on the state model according to one embodiment of the present invention. A state transition module (e.g., state transition module 202) receives 510 an access request from the trading partner. The access request can include a request to view a transaction, and/or a request to perform an action on the transaction.

The state transition module retrieves 520 the state model associated with the request from, for example, a supply chain database (e.g., supply chain database 203). IF the trading partner has viewing access to the transaction 530, the state transition module allows 540 the trading partner to view. If the partner has action access to the transaction 560, the state transition module allows 570 the trading partner to perform an action on the transaction. Depending on the action and/or the trading partner, and action can result in a new state for the transaction.

Table 4 illustrates example actions available to a forecast transaction, and table 5 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action. The rows of table 5 represent source states, the cells represent actions performed against the transaction, and the columns represent the destination states resulting from the action. For example, a transaction at the open state changes to the pending commit state responsive to a submit action. In addition, FIG. 6 is a state diagram 600 that illustrates states and actions associated with table 5. Table 6 illustrates example actions available to an order transaction, and table 7 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action. Table 8 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action on an order header for a buyer. Table 9 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action on an order line for a buyer. Table 10 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action on an order line for a supplier. TABLE 4 illustrates example actions available to a forecast transaction Close The Buyer or Supplier closes the Forecast Commit The Supplier commits to the Forecast Create (START) The Buyer adds a new Forecast Open The user opens the draft Forecast for editing Make Private The Buyer makes the draft Forecast private Make Public The Buyer makes the draft Forecast public Modify Modify the Forecast Publish The Buyer submits the Forecast; no commit is required Re-Commit The Supplier re-commits to the Forecast Submit The Buyer submits the Forecast; a commit is required Supercede The Rules Engine automatically moves “duplicate” Forecasts to superceded UnClose The Buyer or Supplier uncloses a Closed Forecast; it reverts to its previous state

TABLE 5 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action. Private Public Pending Forecast Draft Draft Open Published Commit Committed Closed Superceded (START) Create Private Make Open Publish Submit Draft Public Public Make Open Publish Submit Draft Private Open Make Make Publish Submit Private Public Published Close Supercede Pending Commit Close Supercede Commit Committed Commit Close Closed Un-close Un-close Un-close Superceded

TABLE 6 illustrates example actions available to an order transaction Accept Accept the proposed order changes; once accepted, there is considered to be agreement on all the terms of the order Cancel Allows the user to perform a unilateral cancellation of the order; once the action is performed, the order is cancelled Close Close the Order Create Create and submit a new order Defer Defer action on the order Delete Delete an existing order (“hard” delete), an administrative function Finish Finish items on the order (supplier action only) Modify Allows the user to modify an order that is not pending Order action by the modifying party; the order header information can be edited and send to the other party Receive Receive items on the order Reject Reject pending order changes (roll back or go to pending??) Reply with Propose modifications to an order that is pending action Changes from the side taking the action Request Request cancellation of the order (collaborative to Cancel cancellation) Save Draft Saves the order in Draft state; applies only to orders that have not been submitted to trading partners Ship Ship items on an order Split Line Split an existing line into multiple lines Submit Publishes a draft order Undo Cancel Makes a cancelled order active Undo Close Makes a closed order active

TABLE 7 illustrates example actions available to an order line Accept Accept the proposed line changes; once accepted, there is considered to be agreement on all the terms of the line Cancel Allows the user to perform a unilateral cancellation of the line; once the action is performed, the line is cancelled Close Close an Order Line Defer Defer action on the line Delete Delete an existing line (“hard” delete), an administrative function Finish Finish items on the line (supplier action only) Modify Allows the user to modify a line that is not pending Line action by the modifying party: this action can also create an Order Line Receive Receive items on the line Reject Reject pending line changes (roll back or go pending??) Reply with Propose modifications to a line that is pending action Changes from the side taking the action Request Request cancellation of the line (collaborative to Cancel cancellation) Ship Ship items on the line Split Line Split an existing line into multiple lines Undo Cancel Makes a cancelled line active Undo Close Makes a closed line active

TABLE 8 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action on an order header for a Buyer. P P Pndg Pndg Cncl Cncl Order Draft (S) (B) Open (B) (S) Dfrd Clsd Cncld Pndg (START) SavD Crte (Mod) Draft Sbmt Sbmt Pending(S) RChg RChg Acpt ReqC ReqC Def Cls Can (Mod) Mod Mod Rej Rej Pending(B) RChg RChg Acpt ReqC ReqC Def Cls Can (Mod) Mod Mod Rej Rej Open Mod Mod ReqC ReqC Def Cls Can Pending RChg RChg Def Cls Acpt Cancel(B) Mod Mod Can Rej Rej Pending RChg RChg Def Cls Acpt Cancel(S) Mod Mod Can Rej Rej Deferred Mod Mod ReqC ReqC Cls Can Closed UnCl Cancelled UnCa Pending Mod Mod Acpt ReqC ReqC Def Cls Can Rej Rej

TABLE 9 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action on an order line for a Buyer. P P Pndg Pndg Cncl Cncl Order Line Draft (S) (B) Open (B) (S) Dfrd Clsd Cncld (START) (Mod) Draft Mod SpLn Pending(S) Mod ReqC Def Cls Can SpLn Pending(B) RChg Acpt ReqC Def Cls Can Rej SpLn Open Mod ReqC Def Cls Can SpLn Pending RChg Def Cls Acpt Cancel(B) Rej Can SpLn Pending Mod Def Cls Can Cancel(S) SpLn Deferred Mod ReqC Cls Can Rej Closed UnCl Cancelled UnCa

TABLE 10 illustrates the change in state as a result of the action on an order line for a Supplier. P P Pndg Pndg Cncl Cncl Order Line Draft (S) (B) Open (B) (S) Dfrd Clsd Cncld (START) AdLn Draft Mod SpLn Pending(S) RChg Acpt ReqC Def Cls Can SpLn Pending(B) Mod ReqC Def Cls Can Rej SpLn Open Mod ReqC Def Cls Can SpLn Pending Mod Def Cls Can Cancel(B) SpLn Pending RChg Def Cls Acpt Cancel(S) Mod Can Rej Deferred Mod ReqC Cls Can Rej Closed UnCl Cancelled UnCa

The order in which the steps of the methods of the present invention are performed is purely illustrative in nature. The steps can be performed in any order or in parallel, unless otherwise indicated by the present disclosure. The methods of the present invention may be performed in hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof operating on a single computer or multiple computers of any type. Software embodying the present invention may comprise computer instructions in any form (e.g., source code, object code, interpreted code, etc.) stored in any computer-readable storage medium (e.g., a ROM, a RAM, a magnetic media, a compact disc, a DVD, etc.). Such software may also be in the form of an electrical data signal embodied in a carrier wave propagating on a conductive medium or in the form of light pulses that propagate through an optical fiber.

While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspect and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications, as fall within the true spirit of this invention.

In the above description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the invention.

Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.

Some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.

It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.

The present invention also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus can be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it can comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program can be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.

The algorithms and modules presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems can be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatuses to perform the method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages can be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein. Furthermore, as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art, the modules, features, attributes, methodologies, and other aspects of the invention can be implemented as software, hardware, firmware or any combination of the three. Of course, wherever a component of the present invention is implemented as software, the component can be implemented as a standalone program, as part of a larger program, as a plurality of separate programs, as a statically or dynamically linked library, as a kernel loadable module, as a device driver, and/or in every and any other way known now or in the future to those of skill in the art of computer programming. Additionally, the present invention is in no way limited to implementation in any specific operating system or environment.

It will be understood by those skilled in the relevant art that the above-described implementations are merely exemplary, and many changes can be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications that come within the true spirit and scope of this invention. 

1. In a supply chain management system, a computer-implemented method for managing states of transactions between trading partners states of a supply chain, the method comprising: defining a state model for a transaction that describes a plurality of states for a transaction, and for each state, which of the trading partners have visibility to the transaction; and allowing the trading partner to view the transaction based on the state.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: defining the state model to describe which of the trading partners have the ability to perform actions at the state; and allowing the trading partner to perform an action on the transaction based on the state
 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: receiving the action; determining from the state model how the action affects the state based on the role of the trading partner within the supply chain; and changing the state of the transaction.
 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising: receiving a request from the trading partner for performing a second action; determining from the state model that the trading partner is not able to perform the second action on the transaction based on the state; and not allowing the trading partner to perform the second action.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a request from the trading partner for viewing a second transaction; determining from the state model that the trading partner is not able to view the second transaction based on the state; not allowing the trading partner to view the second transaction.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: defining the state model based on a role of the trading partner within the supply chain.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing a default state model for use as the state model, the default state model having preconfigured descriptions.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the transaction comprises one from the group comprising: a forecast order, a purchase order, a billing, a product shipment, a payment, an invoice, a credit memo, a request for quote (RFQ), and a return material authorization (RMA).
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the action comprises one from the group comprising: create, accept, cancel, close, defer, delete, finish, modify line, receive, reject, reply with changes, request to cancel, ship, split line, undo cancel, and undo close.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the state comprises one from the group comprising: private draft, public draft, open, published, pending, commit, closed, and superseded.
 11. A computer-readable medium storing a computer program product configured to perform a method for managing states of transactions between trading partners states of a supply chain, the method comprising: defining a state model for a transaction that describes a plurality of states for a transaction, and for each state, which of the trading partners have visibility to the transaction; and allowing the trading partner to view the transaction based on the state.
 12. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising: defining the state model to describe which of the trading partners have the ability to perform actions at the state; and allowing the trading partner to perform an action on the transaction based on the state
 13. The computer program product of claim 12, further comprising: receiving the action; determining from the state model how the action affects the state based on the role of the trading partner within the supply chain; and changing the state of the transaction.
 14. The computer program product of claim 12, further comprising: receiving a request from the trading partner for performing a second action; determining from the state model that the trading partner is not able to perform the second action on the transaction based on the state; and not allowing the trading partner to perform the second action.
 15. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising: receiving a request from the trading partner for viewing a second transaction; determining from the state model that the trading partner is not able to view the second transaction based on the state; not allowing the trading partner to view the second transaction.
 16. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising: defining the state model based on a role of the trading partner within the supply chain.
 17. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising: providing a default state model for use as the state model, the default state model having preconfigured descriptions.
 18. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein the transaction comprises one from the group comprising: a forecast order, a purchase order, a billing, a product shipment, a payment, an invoice, a credit memo, a request for quote (RFQ), and a return material authorization (RMA).
 19. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein the action comprises one from the group comprising: create, accept, cancel, close, defer, delete, finish, modify line, receive, reject, reply with changes, request to cancel, ship, split line, undo cancel, and undo close.
 20. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein the state comprises one from the group comprising: private draft, public draft, open, published, pending, commit, closed, and superseded.
 21. A system for managing states of transactions between trading partners states of a supply chain, the method comprising: a transaction state module to define a state model for a transaction that describes a plurality of states for a transaction, and for each state, which of the trading partners have visibility to the transaction, the transaction state module configured to allow the trading partner to view the transaction based on the state.
 22. The system of claim 21, wherein the transaction state module defines the state model to describe which of the trading partners have the ability to perform actions at the state, the transaction state module configured to allow the trading partner to perform an action on the transaction based on the state
 23. The system of claim 22, further comprising: a web interface, coupled in communication with the transaction state module, to receive the action; and a supply chain database, coupled in communication with the transaction state module, to store the state model, wherein the transaction state module determines from the state model how the action affects the state based on the role of the trading partner within the supply chain, and changes the state of the transaction.
 24. The system of claim 22, further comprising: a web interface, coupled in communication with the transaction state module, to receive a request from the trading partner for performing a second action; and a supply chain database, coupled in communication with the transaction state module, to store the state model, wherein the transaction state module determines from the state model that the trading partner is not able to perform the second action on the transaction based on the state, and not allowing the trading partner to perform the second action.
 25. The system of claim 21, further comprising: a web interface, coupled in communication with the transaction state module, to receive a request from the trading partner for viewing a second transaction; a supply chain database, coupled in communication with the transaction state module, to store the state model, wherein the transaction state module determines from the state model that the trading partner is not able to view the second transaction based on the state, and not allowing the trading partner to view the second transaction.
 26. The system of claim 21, wherein the transaction state module defines the state model based on a role of the trading partner within the supply chain. 